Re-Evaluation of the Physical Abilities Readiness Evaluation 1 2 G. Anderson and D. Plecas 1Justice Institute of British Columbia 2University of the Fraser Valley suggest agreement with the obstacle portion with over 85% Regular members’ ratings of the ability of individual elements of the obstacle portion of the PARE to realistically finding the run relevant or very relevant (R/VR), and the length represent the tasks required of police officers in the field. appropriate. SMEs were in agreement with 94.7% rating length as very relevant or relevant. Too… Percentage of responses Too… Controlled falls (following the vaults): 80.0% of respondents The matt jumps Short 2.2 13.3 73.9 7.9 2.8 Long The stairs Few 3.4 17.1 71.2 6.6 1.7 Many reported the controlled falls to be R/VR, although 17.3% The low hurdles Low 2.7 14.9 76.8 4.5 1.1 High suggested modifying this element. In the open comments, 30.1% The vault Low 4.5 16.1 74.8 3.6 1.1 High of all those responding (n=156) suggested deleting the controlled The controlled falls Few 0.8 10.5 70.7 11.5 6.5 Many falls, while 42.2% of the SMEs reported the controlled falls to be The run length Short 3.9 13.9 74.2 6.2 1.8 Long irrelevant or very irrelevant (I/VI). Subject Matter Experts’ ratings of the ability of individual Height of the barrier: In the PARE, the height of the barrier is set elements of the obstacle portion of the PARE to realistically at 0.9 m (3 feet). Presently, 82.2% of respondents suggest represent the tasks required of police officers in the field. retaining the barrier, although 20.6% suggest the barrier was Too… Percentage of responses Too… lower than it should be. SMEs report the barrier to be relevant, The matt jumps Short 5.3 10.5 84.2 Long This research project consisted of three distinct phases: 1. although 52.6% suggest that it is too low. The stairs Few 16.7 83.3 Many instrument development; 2. subject matter experts and The low hurdles Low 16.7 83.3 High Push/Pull section. The ‘fight segment’ of the PARE lasts instrument modification; and, 3. incumbent survey. The vault Low 10.5 42.1 47.4 High approximately 70 seconds (25 seconds for each of the push and The controlled falls Few 5.6 5.6 50.0 22.2 16.7 Many Following instrument development, 20 subject matter pull, and 20 seconds for the controlled falls), and while longer The run length Short 15.8 78.9 5.3 1.8 Long experts (SMEs who were Division Fitness and Lifestyle than the average encounter, is well within the realm of possibility. Advisors) completed the survey and their feedback was then Regular members’ ratings of the ability of individual elements Respondents (84.5%) report this item to be relevant of very used as a basis for discussion and revision of the instrument. of the push/pull portion of the PARE to realistically represent relevant, while SMES were overwhelming in support. Surveys were distributed to a representative sample of the tasks required of police officers in the field. The controlled falls (between the push and pull activities): While RCMP members across Canada immediately after they Too… Percentage of responses Too… offering some face validity, as a police officer could very well fall completed their PARE. There was a 96% response rate with The push segment Light 2.3 19.7 70.6 5.6 1.8 Heavy during the apprehension of a suspect, as part of tussle, or in 844 completed surveys being returned. The pull segment Light 3.3 21.8 69.9 5.3 0.8 Heavy gaining control or fighting with a suspect, both SMEs and The controlled falls Few 1.2 13.4 69.4 11.1 4.8 Many Questionnaires were distributed to each region of Canada respondents were critical of this element. The duration Long 1.6 14.1 79.1 4.4 0.8 Short based on the number of members serving in the region. The resistance for the push/pull section: Present data supports Overall, the regular members surveyed are considered to be Subject Matter Experts’ ratings of the ability of individual the mass encountered in the push and pull segments. Within the a good cross-section of RCMP members from across the elements of the push/pull portion of the PARE to realistically present 95.7% were in reasonable agreement with the weight country including 11.2% from the Atlantic Region, 28.3% represent the tasks required of police officers in the field. while 87% suggest retaining these elements. The SMEs were from the Central, 27.3% from the Mid-West and 32.1% from overwhelming in support of retaining the push and pull, with no Too… Percentage of responses Too… the Pacific Region. single entry suggesting the elements were I/VI. The push segment Light 22.2 77.8 - Heavy Results: The pull segment Light 27.8 72.2 - Heavy Conclusion The controlled falls Few 5.9 64.7 23.5 5.9 Many Of the 844 completed surveys returned 15% were female, Current data provides strong support for the present and 85% male. Age distribution included 18.6% in the 20-29 Discussion: configuration in the PARE. While consideration should be given to year old range, 39.6% in the 30-39, 33.7% in the 40-49 and the enhancement of the PARE, the current and previous task Length of the course: The obstacle portion of the PARE takes 8.7% in the over 50 range. approximately 25 seconds per lap for a total of 2 minutes and analysis do support the test in its actual format and st representative or very representative of police work in the 21 30 seconds, covering 340 meters. Member responses century. While police work is primarily sedentary, police officers are required to frequently engage in near maximal workloads for short periods of time during incidents of a critical nature. The Physical Activities Requirement Evaluation (PARE) was designed as a physical employment standard in 1988 for the RCMP. To examine the elements of the PARE that are most related to the role of police officers in the field, the present study surveyed a group of subject matter experts, and the incumbents concerning the present elements embedded within the PARE, and potential changes that could be made to improve the extent to which the PARE reflected the true physical requirements of police work. Methods: jibc.ca View publication stats 1