justice services provided to children and their parents. Meanwhile, integrated service delivery was tested in four family justice centres in Burnaby/New Westminster, Kitimat, Merritt and Kamloops. Each centre provided different services to test the suitability of alternative delivery models. The centres provided supervised access programs, parenting after separation programs, enhanced mediation and an aboriginal program. An evaluation of the project by a private research firm indicated that client satisfaction increased with staff specialization and the provision of services at one location. The availability of quality family mediation services and parent education programs were also highly valued by parents. Alternative dispute resolution policy Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) was increasingly viewed as an important method of resolving family conflict, although it was not widely available in B.C. during the early 1990s. At the same time, the roles of youth probation, adult probation and family justice services were becoming increasingly complex. Specialized knowledge and skills were required. For probation officers to continue to deliver mediation and conciliation services, they needed specialized knowledge, regular practice, supervision and consistent professional development. To resolve family disputes effectively through mediation, conciliation and non court-based alternatives, the family function needed to be separated from probation.” Refocusing the role of family court counsellors on ADR teceived increasing support within the Branch. If matters could be settled outside coutt, thete would be decreased demand for custody and access reports. A 1994 decision by the Branch to increase mediation training to 80 houts supported this direction. It also enhanced the ability of family court counsellors to resolve family disputes. Information sessions for parents In 1988, Williams Lake Probation and Family Services Office initiated 90-minute Family Relations Act information sessions for families who were experiencing separation.” Family justice counsellors facilitated the sessions and new clients were required to attend them prior to an initial interview with a family justice counsellor. The sessions covered available relief, the court process, impact of separation, family violence and divorce matters. An information package on children’s rights and joint custody was given to clients. Parenting after separation education programs were one of the reform initiatives tested in four locations as patt of the family justice reform pilot project (1994). These programs provided parents with information about dispute resolution options and services available through the justice system and in the community. 60 Malatest & Associates Ltd., Family Justice Reform Pilot Project Evaluation, Ministry of Attorney General, Victoria, B.C., 1995, 61 Interview with Wendy Hacking, 2001. 62 D. Brown, “Family Relations Act Information Sessions,” CorrTech Quarterly, 1(2), 1992, p. 16. The Era of Risk Management (1990-1997) 221