During the same year, administrative accountability was intensified with the passage of “an Act to provide for the proper management of Gaols.” This act outlined the powers of the superintendent of police, which were fairly broad. He was given authority to: » Make rules and regulations for the management, discipline and police of the gaols throughout the Province, and for fixing and prescribing the duties of the officers and servants employed therein...; » Suspend or discipline an employee of the gaols for misconduct which included behaviour he found incapable, inefficient or negligent in the execution of his duty, or whose presence was deemed injurious to the gaol. For example, an employee could be disciplined for bringing into the gaol any liquor, tobacco, opium, snuff or cigars for any convict, except where provided for under gaol regulations; and » Inspect prisons or anyone employed within them at any time. All convicted prisoners in the province sentenced to hard labour were allowed a ration of tobacco, prior to implementation of the Prison Regulations of the Dominion of Canada, After the regulations were adopted, this ration was discontinued. Not surprisingly, this led to more ptisoner complaints and more requests to enter the gaol infirmary. In a letter dated October 13, 1875, the surgeon of the New Westminster Gaol wrote to the inspector of gaols: Granting or withdrawing such ration was of great service in maintaining discipline of the jails of this province and was conducive to better health (particularly for prisoners with long sentences) of the inmates of the jails. The surgeon was responsible for ensuring that copies of the rules were posted in every prison and accessible to all concerned. He also submitted an annual report on the condition and management of gaols in the province. This included suggestions for improvements based on the surgeon’s assessment and gaolers’ reports. Annual reports became a primary means of providing an account of gaols and lockups in the province. Gaolers/wardens were legally required to submit to the superintendent a monthly written statement of expenditures and report on the condition and management of their gaols. The annual report was to contain: (a) A return of the names, ages, country, calling, and crimes of the prisoners received into each such gaol during the year, and the city, town or district from which each came; (b) A return of the names, ages, callings, and ctimes of the offenders who died in each such gaol during the year, and the city town ot district from which each came; (c) A similar return of the offenders liberated during the year by the expiration of the term for which they were sentenced; (d) A similar return of the offenders pardoned during the year; (ec) A statement showing the average number of prisoners confined in the different gaols during the year, up to the date of the last annual return, the number discharged and the number then in confinement; (f) A statement of the expenditure for the past year for the support and maintenance of each gaol, and the amount paid on all other accounts during the year; such statement shall also show, separately, the sums paid for Era of Punishment (1871-1949) 19